Apewifhaste logo

Apewifhaste $haste

Pump.fun token on Solanalaunched 1 hour ago
41
PumpScore 41/100 Grade D
Weak market structure, from 10 live signals. Updated 47 min ago.
PumpScore trend
0past 24h
haste, the ticker for Apewifhaste, scores 41 out of 100 on PumpScore as of Aug 28, 2026 16:30. That grade reflects thin liquidity, heavy 24-hour volume and balanced order flow on the Solana blockchain.

Inside the 41/100

The biggest contributor to its score is price stability (100/100), while liquidity depth (0/100) is the weakest link holding it back.

Liquidity depth0
Liquidity vs market cap0
24h trading volume97
Healthy turnover55
Buy / sell balance94
Trade participation100
Survival time3
Market-cap tier26
Price stability100
Volume vs liquidity0
Price
$0.00000302
Market Cap
$3K
24h Volume
$93.7K
Liquidity
$-
24h Change
-29.04%
24h Buys / Sells
1.1K / 982

Tip Low on trading activity? Many Solana creators use a Pump.fun trending bot to build steady volume and chase King of the Hill.

Contract

Giz3X3maDW4KF4xgPZ3r8huPBn98JthcKRwWEiMfpump

haste - questions answered

What is the PumpScore of Apewifhaste?
Apewifhaste (haste) has a PumpScore of 41/100 - Grade D, weak - as of Aug 28, 2026 16:30. The rating is built from 10 live on-chain signals such as liquidity, volume, buy/sell balance and survival time.
Is haste a good investment?
PumpScore does not give buy or sell advice. A 41/100 grade describes weak market structure for Apewifhaste, not its future price. Newly launched tokens are speculative - only risk what you can lose.
Why does Apewifhaste score 41?
The main driver of the haste score is price stability (100/100); the main drag is liquidity depth (0/100). Each signal is weighted and combined into the 41/100 total.
What is the market cap of Apewifhaste?
As of Aug 28, 2026 16:30, haste trades at $0.00000302 with a market cap near $3K, $93.7K of 24h volume and $- of liquidity. It moved -29.04% over the last day.
Can I trust Apewifhaste?
No score can prove haste is safe. Apewifhaste carries thin liquidity and a 41/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.

Other scored tokens