GPT5.5 Inner Self $INNERSELF
85
PumpScore 85/100 Grade A
GPT5.5 Inner Self earns a 85/100 PumpScore (Grade A). Launched 1 hour ago on Pump.fun, INNERSELF pairs $12.4K of liquidity with $135.8K of 24h trading - solid depth for a token this young.
Score breakdown
On the strength side, price stability leads at 100/100. On the risk side, survival time lags at 3/100.
Liquidity depth67
Liquidity vs market cap100
24h trading volume100
Healthy turnover100
Buy / sell balance94
Trade participation100
Survival time3
Market-cap tier76
Price stability100
Volume vs liquidity98
Price
$0.00002613
Market Cap
$26.1K
24h Volume
$135.8K
Liquidity
$12.4K
24h Change
-22.27%
24h Buys / Sells
1.9K / 1.4K
Tip Struggling to get volume on this token? A Pump.fun trending bot can push real trading activity and help it trend on Pump.fun.
About GPT5.5 Inner Self
The INNERSELF backrooms.
Contract
An7Y69yZJKwTTrdR3xJ3KMz1CHVb1ii7kHzeKLdqpump
Frequently asked questions
Is INNERSELF liquid enough to trade?
GPT5.5 Inner Self holds $12.4K of liquidity - solid for a token this new. Liquidity versus market cap is one of the heaviest factors in its 85/100 score, since thin pools are easy to drain.
How is INNERSELF rated on PumpScore?
GPT5.5 Inner Self (INNERSELF) has a PumpScore of 85/100 - Grade A, strong - as of Jul 7, 2026 13:00. The rating is built from 10 live on-chain signals such as liquidity, volume, buy/sell balance and survival time.
When did INNERSELF launch?
GPT5.5 Inner Self launched on Pump.fun about 1 hour ago. Survival time is part of the score - the longer a token trades without collapsing, the more its structure is trusted.
Does INNERSELF have organic trading?
INNERSELF traded $135.8K in 24h against $12.4K of liquidity, with balanced order flow. PumpScore checks volume-versus-liquidity and buy/sell balance to flag wash-like patterns; this token reads as heavy activity.
Is GPT5.5 Inner Self safe?
No score can prove INNERSELF is safe. GPT5.5 Inner Self carries solid liquidity and a 85/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.
