Flywifhat $flywifhat
59
PumpScore 59/100 Grade C
PumpScore rates Flywifhat (flywifhat) at 59/100 today. The Grade C comes from thin liquidity ($2.2K), heavy volume ($930.7K) and buy-leaning flow, measured live on Solana as of Sep 12, 2026 04:00.
Inside the 59/100
Breaking it down, flywifhat scores highest on trade participation (100/100) and lowest on volume vs liquidity (0/100) - the area to watch.
Liquidity depth31
Liquidity vs market cap100
24h trading volume100
Healthy turnover55
Buy / sell balance84
Trade participation100
Survival time7
Market-cap tier20
Price stability90
Volume vs liquidity0
Price
$0.00000205
Market Cap
$2K
24h Volume
$930.7K
Liquidity
$2.2K
24h Change
-97.12%
24h Buys / Sells
12.3K / 7.5K
Tip Getting noticed on Pump.fun is hard early on - a Pump.fun volume tool is a common way to boost volume and trending.
About Flywifhat
Tiny fly. Big hat. Bigger vibes. Welcome to $FLYWIFHAT — the fly that never takes the hat off. Built on Solana.
Contract
ANeb72CQNVaWvAMH47kDWpiMP81AB4r8Kvj4oPRCpump
flywifhat - questions answered
How do I trade Flywifhat?
flywifhat trades on Solana via Pump.fun and graduated AMMs. Its contract is on this page - copy it from Solscan and confirm it matches before trading Flywifhat.
Does flywifhat have organic trading?
flywifhat traded $930.7K in 24h against $2.2K of liquidity, with buy-leaning order flow. PumpScore checks volume-versus-liquidity and buy/sell balance to flag wash-like patterns; this token reads as heavy activity.
Why does Flywifhat score 59?
The main driver of the flywifhat score is trade participation (100/100); the main drag is volume vs liquidity (0/100). Each signal is weighted and combined into the 59/100 total.
How much liquidity does Flywifhat have?
flywifhat shows $2.2K in its pool (thin depth). Deeper liquidity relative to the $2K market cap generally means steadier prices and lower rug risk.
Is flywifhat a rug pull?
No score can prove flywifhat is safe. Flywifhat carries thin liquidity and a 59/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.
