Catching Pedophiles $Pedos
28
PumpScore 28/100 Grade F
Catching Pedophiles earns a 28/100 PumpScore (Grade F). Launched 2 months ago on Pump.fun, Pedos pairs $- of liquidity with $38 of 24h trading - thin depth for a token this young.
How Pedos scores
Breaking it down, Pedos scores highest on price stability (100/100) and lowest on liquidity depth (0/100) - the area to watch.
Liquidity depth0
Liquidity vs market cap0
24h trading volume0
Healthy turnover1
Buy / sell balance89
Trade participation17
Survival time100
Market-cap tier24
Price stability100
Volume vs liquidity0
Price
$0.0000027
Market Cap
$2.7K
24h Volume
$38
Liquidity
$-
24h Change
-1.31%
24h Buys / Sells
1 / 1
Tip Low on trading activity? Many Solana creators use a Pump.fun trending bot to build steady volume and chase King of the Hill.
About Catching Pedophiles
I'm the biggest pred catching streamer and I'm going to take my talents over to Pumpfun. I will be going live on PF and catching predators and calling police on them.
Contract
8JzGK8Q7bNWHRnqNGpz1zvi38zrMXuz9WucSHXRSpump
Questions about Catching Pedophiles
What is the Pedos price?
Catching Pedophiles is priced at $0.0000027 (-1.31% in 24h), giving it a $2.7K market cap on $- of on-chain liquidity as of Sep 23, 2026 15:00.
Why does Catching Pedophiles score 28?
The main driver of the Pedos score is price stability (100/100); the main drag is liquidity depth (0/100). Each signal is weighted and combined into the 28/100 total.
How is Pedos rated on PumpScore?
As of Sep 23, 2026 15:00, Pedos scores 28 out of 100 on PumpScore (Grade F). The score weighs thin liquidity, light volume and balanced trading into one number.
How much liquidity does Catching Pedophiles have?
Pedos shows $- in its pool (thin depth). Deeper liquidity relative to the $2.7K market cap generally means steadier prices and lower rug risk.
Can I trust Catching Pedophiles?
No score can prove Pedos is safe. Catching Pedophiles carries thin liquidity and a 28/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.
