Global Asset Protocol $GAP
20
PumpScore 20/100 Grade F
Global Asset Protocol (GAP) currently holds a PumpScore of 20/100 - a Grade F read on its Solana market structure. It launched on Pump.fun 2 hours ago and shows thin liquidity of $- with $6.3K traded in the last 24 hours.
What makes up the score
On the strength side, price stability leads at 100/100. On the risk side, liquidity depth lags at 0/100.
Liquidity depth0
Liquidity vs market cap0
24h trading volume58
Healthy turnover14
Buy / sell balance0
Trade participation11
Survival time6
Market-cap tier77
Price stability100
Volume vs liquidity0
Price
$0.0000304
Market Cap
$30.4K
24h Volume
$6.3K
Liquidity
$-
24h Change
-
24h Buys / Sells
1 / 0.0000
Tip Want more eyes on your launch? A Pump.fun volume generator helps generate volume and momentum for newly launched Pump.fun tokens.
About Global Asset Protocol
The Tokenization Of Global Assets Under The GAP
Contract
5sh4X9CJmmELDje5zM9PHjedCd7VHvCx4pp1Q2i3pump
Common questions about Global Asset Protocol
What is the market cap of Global Asset Protocol?
As of Jul 29, 2026 20:00, GAP trades at $0.0000304 with a market cap near $30.4K, $6.3K of 24h volume and $- of liquidity. It moved - over the last day.
Is Global Asset Protocol volume real?
Volume looks steady at $6.3K. Because outsized volume on thin liquidity can signal wash trading, that ratio feeds directly into the 20/100 score for Global Asset Protocol.
How much liquidity does Global Asset Protocol have?
GAP shows $- in its pool (thin depth). Deeper liquidity relative to the $30.4K market cap generally means steadier prices and lower rug risk.
Is GAP a good investment?
PumpScore does not give buy or sell advice. A 20/100 grade describes high risk market structure for Global Asset Protocol, not its future price. Newly launched tokens are speculative - only risk what you can lose.
Can I trust Global Asset Protocol?
No score can prove GAP is safe. Global Asset Protocol carries thin liquidity and a 20/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.
