Global Asset Protocol $GAP
48
PumpScore 48/100 Grade D
Global Asset Protocol (GAP) currently holds a PumpScore of 48/100 - a Grade D read on its Solana market structure. It launched on Pump.fun 2 months ago and shows thin liquidity of $1.5K with $16 traded in the last 24 hours.
What makes up the score
On the strength side, volume vs liquidity leads at 100/100. On the risk side, 24h trading volume lags at 0/100.
Liquidity depth22
Liquidity vs market cap100
24h trading volume0
Healthy turnover1
Buy / sell balance0
Trade participation11
Survival time100
Market-cap tier15
Price stability100
Volume vs liquidity100
Price
$0.00000143
Market Cap
$1.4K
24h Volume
$16
Liquidity
$1.5K
24h Change
-
24h Buys / Sells
0.0000 / 1
Tip Want more eyes on your launch? A Pump.fun volume generator helps generate volume and momentum for newly launched Pump.fun tokens.
About Global Asset Protocol
The Tokenization Of Global Assets Under The GAP
Contract
5sh4X9CJmmELDje5zM9PHjedCd7VHvCx4pp1Q2i3pump
Common questions about Global Asset Protocol
What is the market cap of Global Asset Protocol?
As of Sep 23, 2026 15:00, GAP trades at $0.00000143 with a market cap near $1.4K, $16 of 24h volume and $1.5K of liquidity. It moved - over the last day.
Is Global Asset Protocol volume real?
Volume looks light at $16. Because outsized volume on thin liquidity can signal wash trading, that ratio feeds directly into the 48/100 score for Global Asset Protocol.
How much liquidity does Global Asset Protocol have?
GAP shows $1.5K in its pool (thin depth). Deeper liquidity relative to the $1.4K market cap generally means steadier prices and lower rug risk.
Is GAP a good investment?
PumpScore does not give buy or sell advice. A 48/100 grade describes weak market structure for Global Asset Protocol, not its future price. Newly launched tokens are speculative - only risk what you can lose.
Can I trust Global Asset Protocol?
No score can prove GAP is safe. Global Asset Protocol carries thin liquidity and a 48/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.
