Pedro Pedro Pedro $Pedro
85
PumpScore 85/100 Grade A
Pedro Pedro Pedro (Pedro) currently holds a PumpScore of 85/100 - a Grade A read on its Solana market structure. It launched on Pump.fun 1 hour ago and shows solid liquidity of $21.9K with $160.6K traded in the last 24 hours.
Score breakdown
On the strength side, volume vs liquidity leads at 100/100. On the risk side, survival time lags at 4/100.
Liquidity depth79
Liquidity vs market cap100
24h trading volume100
Healthy turnover100
Buy / sell balance91
Trade participation100
Survival time4
Market-cap tier84
Price stability70
Volume vs liquidity100
Price
$0.00008806
Market Cap
$88.1K
24h Volume
$160.6K
Liquidity
$21.9K
24h Change
+185%
24h Buys / Sells
2.5K / 1.7K
Tip Struggling to get volume on this token? A Pump.fun volume generator can push real trading activity and help it trend on Pump.fun.
About Pedro Pedro Pedro
Pedro the raccoon owner onboard
Contract
3ME1VBnWV6qdCSrKNndCqteS6LHRoM4nFcV99AeHpump
Frequently asked questions
Where can I buy Pedro?
You can find Pedro Pedro Pedro on Pump.fun and Solana DEXs. Verify the exact contract address on a block explorer first, since copycat tickers are common.
Is Pedro a good investment?
PumpScore does not give buy or sell advice. A 85/100 grade describes strong market structure for Pedro Pedro Pedro, not its future price. Newly launched tokens are speculative - only risk what you can lose.
Does Pedro have organic trading?
Pedro traded $160.6K in 24h against $21.9K of liquidity, with balanced order flow. PumpScore checks volume-versus-liquidity and buy/sell balance to flag wash-like patterns; this token reads as heavy activity.
Why does Pedro Pedro Pedro score 85?
The main driver of the Pedro score is volume vs liquidity (100/100); the main drag is survival time (4/100). Each signal is weighted and combined into the 85/100 total.
Can I trust Pedro Pedro Pedro?
No score can prove Pedro is safe. Pedro Pedro Pedro carries solid liquidity and a 85/100 structure read, but brand-new tokens can fail regardless. Treat this as data, not advice.
